Quick Qs; was Pharaoh Akhenaten pressured by the Hebrews to conform to Monotheism

First, who is Pharaoh Akhenaten? He was an Egyptian ruler in the 18th Dynasty. One thing he is most known for was that he abandoned the traditional polytheistic religion of Egypt, and instead introduced Atenism, which center around the god Aten.

This move wasn’t widely accepted, and after Akhenaten died, there was a major move to erase him from Egyptian history. It wasn’t until the late 19th century that we discovered who he was, when Amarna, which was the new capital city he had built for Aten, or the worship of Aten, was uncovered.

Interestingly enough, his wife, Nefertiti, has largely overshadowed her husband due to the famous bust of her, which is one of the most copied and admired images from ancient Egypt

Nefertiti bust

So, to the question, did the Hebrews influence Akhenaten? Short answer, no.

Longer answer, while it is very probable that a group of individuals, who had been held in slavery or subpar conditions in Egypt, later migrated to the Levant and helped form what would become the Israelites, the story in the Biblical account just isn’t accurate. There was most likely no mass slavery of proto-Israelites, and no mass exodus.

There is debate as to the legitimacy of an Egyptian group at all, but most mainstream scholarship on the origins of the Jewish people argues that what the exodus shows (besides the theological implications) is the remembering of one small group that migrated to the Levant and eventually mixed with other groups, one probably from the Mesopotamia region and another that split off from the Canaanites. These multiple groups merged, and eventually worked to create a unified national epic that contained historical nuggets of all three.

Even if we accepted a mass migration, the Hebrews at that time weren’t really monotheistic. They practiced a form of polytheism called henotheism. And to be fair, some of the early Hebrews also worshipped multiple gods.

A better connection with monotheism would have been Zoroastrianism, which was a dominant force in Persia (or became such. The religion had an origin further back, most likely forming alongside what became Hinduism). There may have been some influence with Egypt, but I think that may all be reaching for a solution that isn’t needed.

The easiest answer is that a monotheistic view isn’t that much of a stretch from polytheism, especially when you place politics with it. It’s an easy way that one can unify a country even more, or it can blow up in your face.

Leave a Reply